t think they’

fertieg97

— patrick
— Gary

— Ian Kemmish
I imagine the gratuitous gore was intended to stir up interest in their campaign.
This is so over the top that one has to wonder why nobody -writers, editors, sponsors,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], creative consultants, participants – thought it was a bad idea …. unless they really are callous to anything but an agenda. Most telling may be the behind-the-scenes production clip. The children seem oblivious to what is being suggested and delight in the fun while being exploited. One gore-covered boy says about the blood-spattered effects, “It’s for a good cause.” He appears already to be on the career-track of a bureaucrat or politician who knows better than his constituents and will make them do what’s good for them. Chilling.
pretty nasty
— Matt
The British environmental group 10:10,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], devoted to cutting carbon emissions 10 percent each year,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], created a message video that was a bit too explosive for its own good. The gist: any poor sap who fails to go along with the 10 percent cut, be it a schoolchild or a soccer star, is blown to smithereens. It’s been pulled from YouTube, and it has angered allies like Bill McKibben. The video can still be seen here; the bloodletting is graphic (if intended to be comical), so use your judgment before playing.
Unfortunately, 10:10 seems to be mostly fronted by celebrities and op-ed journalists who’ve only just switched to CFL light bulbs. If you’re doing that, then it’s easy to cut by 10% in one year (and I don’t think they’ve even been gong that long). But I’m not sure that those of us who did the easy stuff way back in the 1990’s figure much in their world view….
YouTube banning it is just the icing on the cake, look at all this free publicity it’s getting now.